Market Alert: US Sets Tariff Floor at 15% – Potentially Rising to 50% from 01 August 2025

Boss Energy Crashes 44% as Honeymoon Uranium Project Faces Ramp-Up Woes and Cost Blowouts

Jul 28, 2025

Highlights:

  • Boss Energy (ASX: BOE) shares plunge 44% to AU$1.905 — a three-year low
  • Operational challenges and higher costs shake investor confidence
  • FY26 guidance surprises with sharp rise in capital expenditure and removal of nameplate capacity targets
  • CEO Duncan Craib to step down, compounding strategic uncertainty

Honeymoon Turns Sour Despite Exceeding FY25 Guidance

Shares of Boss Energy Limited (ASX: BOE) nosedived 44% on Monday, after the uranium miner issued a sobering operational update that stunned the market. The company, which owns and operates the 100%-owned Honeymoon uranium project in South Australia, flagged material ramp-up challenges that could delay achieving full production capacity.

This came despite exceeding its FY25 production and cost guidance. Instead of celebrating operational success, the market was jolted by a revision in outlook, as Boss removed previously stated nameplate capacity targets and warned of elevated FY26 costs.


1. Market Shock from FY26 Guidance

The main trigger was the release of FY2026 guidance for the Honeymoon uranium project, which contained several unexpectedly negative surprises:

🔺 Higher Operating Costs

  • C1 cash costs were guided at A$41–45/lb, up from prior expectations.
  • All-In Sustaining Costs (AISC) climbed to A$64–70/lb.
  • These cost increases were higher than analysts and investors had anticipated, especially given previous guidance was more optimistic.

🔍 Reason: Costs are rising due to lower ore grade tenor and changes in the extraction process (e.g., new lixiviant chemistry), leading to higher consumables usage.

🚫 2. Removal of Nameplate Production Targets

Boss withdrew its nameplate capacity guidance, casting serious doubt over the ability of the Honeymoon project to ramp up as originally planned.

  • Previously, Boss had forecast a clear path to full-scale production.
  • Now, management acknowledges geological uncertainty in the East Kalkaroo region, including:
    • Less continuity in mineralized zones
    • Need for more wells (both injection and recovery)

🧨 Implication: Higher capital intensity and lower predictability, reducing the long-term return profile of the project.

💸 3. Hefty Capital Expenditure Surprise

Boss flagged FY26 capital spending of AU$56–62 million, split between sustaining capex and project infrastructure — well above market expectations.

  • Sustaining capital (A$29–32M) will be spent mostly on 4–5 new wellfields.
  • Infrastructure spends (A$27–30M) includes delayed FY25 projects and East Kalkaroo upgrades.

💥 Analysts were caught off guard by this unexpected scale of reinvestment just as the company was expected to transition to steady-state operations.

🧑‍💼 4. Leadership Instability

Adding to investor concerns, Boss announced that CEO Duncan Craib would step down later this year, after nearly 8 years in charge.

  • He will transition to a non-executive director role in 2026.
  • The timing of this announcement — alongside technical and financial headwinds — added a layer of strategic uncertainty.

⚠️ Leadership changes during operational ramp-up phases often shake investor confidence due to fears of internal disagreements or execution risk.

📉 5. Valuation Reset & Loss of Momentum

Prior to the crash, Boss Energy had been trading at a premium valuation, buoyed by:

  • Rising uranium prices
  • Strong FY25 execution
  • Optimism around global nuclear energy expansion

However, the combination of cost blowouts, growth uncertainty, and leadership turnover led to a sharp re-rating by institutional investors.

🔚 Conclusion: A Confidence Crisis, Not Just a Cost Issue

Boss Energy's share price crash wasn't caused by a single factor — it was a perfect storm of deteriorating project economics, shifting guidance, and leadership turnover.

Until the company provides clearer updates on:

  • Updated feasibility study implications
  • Revised production timeline
  • Leadership succession plans

...the stock is likely to remain volatile and under pressure.

 

 

 Customer Notice:

Nextgen Global Services Pty Ltd trading as Kapitales Research (ABN 89 652 632 561) is a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR No. 1293674) of Enva Australia Pty Ltd (AFSL 424494). The information contained in this website is general information only. Any advice is general advice only. No consideration has been given or will be given to the individual investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person. The decision to invest or trade and the method selected is a personal decision and involves an inherent level of risk, and you must undertake your own investigations and obtain your own advice regarding the suitability of this product for your circumstances. Please be aware that all trading activity is subject to both profit & loss and may not be suitable for you. The past performance of this product is not and should not be taken as an indication of future performance.

 

Disclosure: The information mentioned above has been sourced from the company reports and a third-party database, i.e. Koyfin. Investors are advised to use strict stop-loss to protect their investments in case of any unfavorable/uncertain market events.

 

Kapitales Research, Level 13, Suite 1A, 465 Victoria Ave, Chatswood, NSW 2067, Australia | 1800 005 780 | info@kapitales.com.au